Baptismal relic latest focus of opposing narratives

But Palestinians scoffed at the claim of the relic being hidden. George Rishmawi, the director of Abraham Path, a local tourist initiative that conducts tours in Palestine, told Al-Monitor that the stone baptismal site has been part of a regular tour for years. “You can see it on our website. Thousands of people have seen it and pictured it,” Rishmawi said, adding that Jerry Levine, a pro-Palestinian-American Jewish activist, wrote a long piece about the relic 20 years ago.

A 2015 documentary prepared by Jerusalem’s Christian Media Center, a Catholic nongovernmental organization, reveals that the rosy font, which weighs approximately eight tons, was part of a local Byzantine-era church. The documentary also includes interviews with people who have followed and documented the relic.

Palestinians confirm that in fact the relic was stolen by archaeological thieves in 2000 from the nearby Khirbet Tuqu, but that the Tuqu municipality succeeded in bringing it back. Abu Mufreh told Al-Monitor that they had found it in the largely Christian town of Beit Jala and brought it back. “For us, this is part of our heritage and we wanted it to be preserved,” he noted. 

Not finding a proper place to put this huge monument, the municipality agreed to temporarily place it in Abu Mufreh’s garden. “We contacted the Palestinian Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities and we asked them to find a proper place for it. We have also been considering creating a local museum, but we have not been able to raise enough money for that,” Abu Mufreh added.

Al-Monitor has learned that the Palestinian Ministry of Tourism is planning to issue a detailed report on the case in cooperation with the Palestinian mission to UNESCO.

According to Abu Mufreh, part of the problem has been the unfair division of Palestinian land in the Oslo Accord into Area A, Area B and Area C. 

Palestinian archaeologists have been barred from doing any digs in Area C, which is under total Israeli administrative and security control whereas Area A and Area B are under Palestinian administrative control and archaeological digs are allowed. The original location of the font was in nearby Khirbet Tuqu, which is in Area C, whereas the home of Abu Mufreh is in Area B. Israeli security is allowed freely into both Area B and Area C, according to the Oslo Accord.

Rishmawi confirmed the details of the font’s recent history and said that the Ministry of Tourism did create an identification number for it and documented it with the relevant international agencies. UNESCO has yet to produce a statement on the case, and Israel has not revealed where the relic has been taken to.

The controversy over the archaeological relic is the latest case of alternate narratives, with Israelis insisting on rejecting that Palestinian areas taken in the 1967 war are “occupied territories.” Israel officials deal with the area using the Jewish term Judea and Samaria as their own, claiming it has always belonged to Jews and that they have a right to despite it being populated by Palestinians for millennia.