Iran’s budget banking on US lifting sanctions

In addition, 38% of the oil and gas revenues should be paid into the National Development Fund (NDF) based on the provisions of the current Five-Year Development Plan (2016-2021). However, just 20% of oil and gas revenues are about to be allocated to the NDF since the government has requested to withdraw the remaining 18% without due process of applying to the NDF’s board of trustees. Nonetheless, realizing the projected amount of oil and gas sales and access to hard currency has proved to be a tall order in previous years. Thus, this is another indication that the budget deficit is already in the cards as a direct outcome of fanciful budgeting for next year.

Out of about 841 trillion tomans ($32.4 billion) of the government’s general resources, approximately 318 trillion tomans or almost 38% is projected to be provisioned by collecting taxes and other income. As businesses have been under severe financial pressures due to the coronavirus pandemic and US sanctions, the government is best advised to expand the tax base, counter tax evasion — estimated to be more than 40 trillion tomans ($1.5 billion) every year — smarten tax systems and online connection of data and information between state agencies. After the imposition of the US sanctions against Iran in 2018, President Rouhani’s government had adequate time to move toward creating sustainable revenues for the country. Nevertheless, this never happened and structural budget reforms remained on paper.

Besides, the government intends to contribute 298.5 trillion tomans ($11.5 billion) to its resources issuing and selling financial assets. In this year’s Budget Law, the government had considered about 174.7 trillion tomans ($6.7 billion) of financing through offering financial securities in the Iranian capital market, indicating a rise of 71% compared with its preceding year. The government is determined to supply 35% of its general budget next year by selling government bonds and shares of state-owned companies to investors. However, one should bear in mind that at the end of the seventh Iranian month — ending Nov. 20 — the government was only able to finance about 110 trillion tomans ($4.2 billion) of its 2019-20 budget, selling treasury bonds and equities.

To boost the economy and create jobs, the approved budget for infrastructure projects for the current year is close to 88 trillion tomans ($3.4 billion). That being said, in the draft budget only an increase of 18% is considered for development projects over 2021-22. This meager hike is not only neutral but also negative in regard to the current point-to-point inflation rate. Needles to say, it does not bear the advantage of encouraging employment and prosperity in different types of business industries across the country.

One of the major factors that every government takes into account for drafting their budget bills is the balance between payments and receipts, an issue that has been neglected in the drafting of Iran’s national budget bills in recent years. Generally, the budget’s operating balance shows the difference between revenues — tax revenues and other non-oil revenues — and expenditures. In the general policies of the recent Five-Year Development Plans, one of the most important goals has been to reduce the existing budget deficits to zero. This means that government spending ought to be supplied by government non-oil revenues. Nevertheless, the performance of the operating balance indicates that the operating balance deficit has vastly risen from 1.76 trillion tomans in 1995 to about 104 trillion tomans in 2019. In other words, the deficit has not only skyrocketed over the last 24 years, it has also climbed up by about 60 times. During the Fourth to Sixth Five-Year Development Plans, this deficit has still multiplied by about eight times in spite of the targets set for this measure.

Despite the fact that various administrations including the Rouhani government have incessantly claimed over the years about nondependence on oil revenues in the budget, the reality is that it is not possible to break dependence on oil without changing economic structures. Unless the tax base is reformed, inflation is controlled, the imbalances of the country’s banking system are eliminated and the growth of liquidity is not controlled, it seems premature to have the budget readily deprived of oil revenues all at once.

In general, the budget bill’s resources have been prepared with irrational growth due to the forecast of unrealistic revenues with the presumption of removal of oil sanctions. Should the bill not seriously be amended by the parliament, an eye-watering budget deficit awaits at the horizon for the next administration. This denotes that the next president is doomed to encounter imminent crises in his first year of office.